House rules
The method: sources, dates read, and blank fields
Every field in our comparisons came from a document published by the operator or from a licence register, with the date read noted. Where the document says nothing, the field stays empty and says so: across 100 brands read, 68 carry a licence number, 38 carry the country list, 14 carry a withdrawal ceiling and 5 carry the amount that triggers identity verification.
Where each field comes from
Two sources, and only two: the document published by the operator itself, almost always the terms of use, and the register that issued the licence claimed.
Three things survive each reading: the figure, the clause number where one exists, and the date the document was opened. Without those three, the data does not go in.
Nothing is converted to make the fields uniform. A ceiling in USDT is recorded in USDT, and an amount in euro stays in euro, because conversion invents a precision the contract does not have.
The three states of a field
A reader meets three different answers in our tables, and they are not synonyms.
- An amount published. The contract carries the figure, and almost always the clause. Example: €2,500 in Bitcasino.io's clause 6.6.
- The site's own decision. The contract addresses the subject and says the decision rests with the operator, with no amount. Example: Vave's clause 8.7.
- Not read. The document did not open, or the passage was not found. The field says that and implies nothing.
The difference between the second and third states is the most important one. An operator that declares it decides case by case has published a policy; a document that was not read published nothing at all, and turning one into the other is the mistake this method exists to prevent. The full inventory by field shows the real proportions.
What we never fill in
We do not estimate, do not round to a tidy number, and do not copy a figure from somebody else's review. A plausible limit is indistinguishable from a real one once published, and survives many pages before anyone opens the contract.
Nor do we use an access-refusal screen as proof of anything. It can come from the provider, the operator, a filter, or the location of the reading server, and those four causes cannot be told apart from the image.
And we do not describe any operator compared as authorised by the SPA/MF. None of them is on the list, and what the list asserts has an exact outline.
What we do not write, by decision
There is no game strategy here, no tip about an advantageous game, and no promise of a return. There is no countdown, no count of people looking at the page, and no manufactured scarcity.
We do not describe ways of getting around a block, a filter or an identity check, not even in the form of a warning. And we do not assert that playing at an unauthorised operator is permitted: the legal frame sits on a single page.
Nor do we report our own experience with money. This site reads documents.
How the paid partner appears
Vave is a commercial partner, and the link to it is paid for. That is written next to the comparison card, next to the button, and in the caption.
It takes part in no counts, is not ordered by merit, and receives no fields filled in as a courtesy. Its terms do not open for automated reading, so the fact fields stay empty — exactly as they would for any other operator in the same position.
A brand that pays and still appears with blank fields is the simplest test that the rule holds.
What is still missing from this site
There are no screenshots of the clauses cited. The clause numbers are written so any reader can check them in the original document, but the image of the passage read is not published here.
There are no individual analysis pages per operator. The comparison today rests on the compared fields and the thematic pages, and reading the address remains the check a reader can run alone, in less time than any review takes.
And the data describes the window in which it was read, between 26 August and 2 September 2026. What a licence number confirms depends on the day of the lookup as much as on the number.
Corrections
An error pointed out with a document is corrected, and the date read is updated with it. We would rather delete a whole field than keep it with half its values guessed.
That is what happened with the accepted-coins field, which exists in the base, appears in the page text, and stayed out of the table: with 30 lists published across 100 brands, such a column would mostly show what had not been read. The clause on countries served stayed in the table for the opposite reason.
Questions
Do you test the casinos with your own money?
No. This site reads documents: terms published by operators, and licence registers. There is no account here of a deposit, a withdrawal or customer service from our own experience, and no sentence should be read as though there were.What happens when the document does not carry the figure?
The field stays empty and the label says what that means. There are three different states in the table: an amount published, a decision the operator declares without an amount, and a document not read. Treating all three as one would turn an absence into information.How does the paid partner appear in the comparisons?
Vave occupies first place in the comparison because it is paid placement, and the notice sits next to the card and the button. It takes no part in any count or merit ordering, and its fields stay blank because the terms do not open for automated reading.How often is the data reviewed?
The readings behind this site were made between 26 August and 2 September 2026, and the date travels with each record. A contract can be altered the next day, which is why the date matters as much as the figure.